Vendor comparison

Vanta vs Drata

Two mature compliance automation platforms that solve the same problem in similar ways. This page compares how they are structured, where they differ in practice, and what to confirm before you sign. We take no referral fees from either vendor.

On pricing: both vendors quote privately and adjust by headcount, framework count and contract term. We deliberately do not publish invented per-seat numbers. Cells below marked verify current pricing must be confirmed with the vendor directly. For budgeting, our calculators model the category at $8,000–$30,000 per year.

Feature comparison

Vanta and Drata compared across buying criteria
CriterionVantaDrata
Core purposeContinuous control monitoring and audit evidence automationContinuous control monitoring and audit evidence automation
Framework coverageSOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS and further frameworks as add-onsSOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS and further frameworks as add-ons
Integration approachLarge catalogue of cloud, HR, identity and ticketing integrationsLarge catalogue of cloud, HR, identity and ticketing integrations
Auditor relationshipMarketplace of partner audit firms; you contract the auditor separatelyMarketplace of partner audit firms; you contract the auditor separately
Personnel controlsBackground checks, security training and policy acceptance workflowsBackground checks, security training and policy acceptance workflows
Trust page / security portalIncluded public trust centre for sharing posture with prospectsIncluded public trust centre for sharing posture with prospects
Vendor / third-party riskBuilt-in vendor risk module, depth varies by tierBuilt-in vendor risk module, depth varies by tier
Base subscriptionVerify current pricingVerify current pricing
Additional framework costVerify current pricingVerify current pricing
Onboarding / implementation feeVerify current pricingVerify current pricing
Multi-year discountVerify current pricingVerify current pricing
Typical contract termAnnual, with multi-year optionsAnnual, with multi-year options

Where the difference actually shows up

Feature grids for this category converge fast — both vendors ship control libraries, integration catalogues, policy templates, personnel workflows and a trust page. The decision rarely turns on a missing checkbox. It turns on four things that a comparison table cannot capture on its own.

Your existing stack. The value of the platform is proportional to how much evidence it collects without human intervention. Before demos, list your cloud provider, identity provider, HR system, ticketing system, endpoint management and code host. Ask each vendor to demonstrate those specific integrations live, pulling real evidence, rather than showing the logo wall.

Which auditor you plan to use. Both run partner marketplaces, and an auditor already fluent in the platform will spend fewer hours interpreting your evidence export. If you have a preferred CPA firm, ask them which platform they receive cleanest evidence from — that answer is worth more than any feature comparison.

Framework roadmap. If SOC 2 is the only near-term requirement, either platform will do. If ISO 27001, HIPAA or PCI DSS is coming within eighteen months, price the multi-framework bundle now and get the add-on cost written into the initial contract. Adding frameworks mid-term is where budgets break.

Support model. Named customer success contact versus pooled support is a real differentiator during your first audit, and it usually maps to contract tier rather than to the vendor. Ask what happens when a control breaks two weeks before fieldwork.

Questions to ask both vendors

  1. What is the all-in first-year cost including onboarding, at our exact headcount?
  2. What does the price become at renewal, and what is the uplift cap?
  3. Which of our specific integrations collect evidence automatically today?
  4. What is the cost to add a second and third framework mid-contract?
  5. Can we export all evidence and policies if we leave, and in what format?
  6. Which audit firms in your marketplace have completed the most audits on-platform?

Do you need a platform at all?

For a company under roughly twenty-five people with a single cloud account and a tidy identity provider, a first SOC 2 Type 1 can be run on spreadsheets and a document repository. The trade is real: you save the subscription and pay it back in internal hours, and you lose the continuous monitoring that keeps you audit-ready between reports. Toggle the platform setting on the SOC 2 cost calculator to see that trade priced out for your headcount.

How we keep this page honest

Cost of Compliance has no affiliate relationship with Vanta, Drata or any other vendor named on this site. Where we are not certain of a current price, we say so rather than publishing a number that will be stale within a quarter. If you have a current quote and are willing to share the structure of it, our contact page explains how we handle submissions. See our methodology for how figures across the site are derived. Also compare Drata vs Secureframe.